My Emotional Support Rabbit

I want an Emotional Support Rabbit, I’ve decided. According to the BBC, anyway, such fabulous creatures are allowed to accompany those suffering from anxiety, depression and other mental health issues on to American aeroplanes. What a wonderful thing. There have apparently been Emotional Support Kangaroos, Emotional Support Turkeys, Emotional Support Cats and Dogs, even an Emotional Support Miniature Horse. (Presumably the turkeys would be excused flights home for Thanksgiving.) However, a Support Peacock by the name of Dexter was turned away because he was too big and heavy. The Support Miniature Horse was in fact smaller and lighter than the Support Peacock?

After the peacock incident United Airlines decided to ban a range of less usual creatures, including frogs, hedgehogs and goats, and are currently limiting it to cats, dogs, and of course miniature horses.

In Britain, of course, we are far more staid. Just tune in to a session of Parliament and watch the MPs discussing Brexit – bellowing, jeering, catcalling and even, fairly recently, making sheep noises – to be sure of this. (I am not sure if they ever tracked down that sheep-noise maker: they were certainly trying quite hard to.) So, British airlines, being far more staid, do not permit support animals for mental health conditions, though they do permit physical disability/guide dogs, and presumably those might be doubling as emotional support.

This reminds me of a Christmas Dinner I was once forced to attend with my colleagues at Poop, Stagger & Collapse, Solicitors (no, not really). We were sitting around long tables in a restaurant slightly more expensive than most of us would have normally been able to afford – draughty and underheated, with snowy-white tablecloths adding to the general chill. At the end of the food and quite a few bottles of wine, nearly all of the partners (or so it seemed) stood up to give a speech about the progress the firm had made in the past year and it’s plans for the one to come. The final, particularly long and rambling speech was interrupted by mysterious crowings – Cock-a-doodle-doooo, etc – from a novelty alarm clock. Everyone knew who it was, but since he was a Partner himself nothing was done.

Back to Emotional Support Creatures. Given the choice I would go for an Emotional Support Little Rabbit – just big enough to fit in my jacket pocket, with large brown eyes and twitchy little whiskers. Much as I love cats they are absolutely no good at emotional support. A cat will scratch you when you’re down, demand food when you’re stressed. Cats poop, piddle and vomit everywhere. Trying to persuade a cat not to perform three of his five Favourite Natural Functions just because it was on an aeroplane – nah! Taking a cat anywhere, even six miles in a motor car, leaves one a nervous wreck. Or nervous boat as a distance learning student once put it:

My postal course materials am stolen in the prison where I reside. Please, I am become a nervous boat.

It does seem to be a week for animal-themed posts. I follow an excellent WordPress blog called ‘English Language Thoughts’ and the question posed was;

Which would you choose – to be able to speak another language or to speak to the animals?

My Comment was that talking to the animals would be best. At my time of life and in my straitened circumstances I am hardly likely to need to speak to a foreign person in their own language. Unless Britain happens to be invaded by Foreign Persons in which case I shall sincerely wish I had learned that particular language and start scrabbling around for text books and studying by candle-light.

But how useful, to be able to ask your pet how it felt instead of hazarding a guess. Pets are notoriously ‘stoical’, ie they keep a poker face and disguise suffering as a defence against predators. How many trips to the vet could be saved if they could just tell you.

On the other hand – what if our beloved animals, no longer mute, chose to inform us stuff we didn’t want to hear – anything from I abhor this leopard-skin collar to Why exactly did you remove my reproductive organs when I was just a kitten? to What about vivisection!

I have always assumed my own cats to be super intelligent. Inside those furry little noddles they would have been composing Oscar Wilde-type witticisms or ruminating upon the meaning of life from a feline perspective. But it occurs to me that this ain’t necessarily so. Supposing they are really stupid? Supposing all they can chat about is Whiskas versus Felix? Supposing their political opinions can be summarised in one sentence: Well, there’s nothing I can do about anything in any case so I’m not even going to think about it.

Yes, someone actually said that to me. And she wasn’t a cat, either.

9 thoughts on “My Emotional Support Rabbit

  1. I have to admit, I thought the support horse on the plane was a bit much. But a support rabbit would be perfect! And even though I probably don’t want to know everything my pets are thinking, it would be helpful to speak their language now and then. And certainly more interesting than speaking to another human being in a foreign language, I think!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am obliged to speak to others in a foreign – to me – language….getting on in years I can find it quite tiring so would prefer to be able to chat to animals. There are a couple of sheep who have the sort of eye worthy of a dowager duchess….I could settle down in a chair in their stable and enjoy their company.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No. I think that was what I was thinking when I wrote that last bit, but couldn’t quite capture. It also occurred to me that I get on with animals more easily than with humans is precisely because they don’t speak. It’s difficult to lie during silent communication.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. That’s quite an interesting entry. I’m wondering, I’ve actually heard about the miniature horse as support animal but I can’t even picture a pony getting on an airplane. Have you actually seen this on planes? Wow. I think that except for Veterans and severely disabled individuals, support animals should be limited to stuffed animals without fur . (Smiles. The fur would set off allergies). Okay, so I was just kidding. I’m lost after reading that entry. I can’t tell what is real and what is not real . I still can’t believe they are going to let horses on planes. I love horses but I think they all belong on the ground. If I had a horse I would not want my horse to be on a plane. (LOL.. now you’re probably lost reading this response. Is she serious or not? ) Peace artfromperry

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi, sorry for delay in your comment appearing. I had to moderate. I haven’t actually seen a horse or any animal on a plane. Indeed, I haven’t been on a plane since 1980. I checked back and see that I read the article on the BBC News app several months ago.

      The mini horse was called Flirty, and it was on an American flight. There is also a picture of the rejected peacock. I also googled ‘horse on plane’ and it came up again, and there are pictures of the horse. I would tend to believe it because I trust the BBC, but who knows nowadays, when everything in cyberspace can be faked. For the sake of the horse, not the human, anyway, it seems like a really bad idea.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s