Oh, for Pete’s Sake!

I’m not sure who Pete was, originally. I suspect he got slotted into this generalised expression of annoyance merely because he had one syllable and was easy to substitute for the word you really wanted to say. But then, you’d have thought Jack would have been better. Closer to the original, as in Cripes! for Christ, Heck! for Hell or – that old favourite of American scriptwriters attempting to write Cockney – Blimey! which was originally ‘Gor Blimey’ and before that ‘God Blind – or Blame – Me!’

A number of things have prompted me to exclaim Oh, for Pete’s Sake! recently. The Millennial or Snowflake Generation, it is claimed, have grown up over-protected and therefore tending to feel special, unique, entitled, overly emotional and easily offended. I am not actually in a position to discuss this with any genuine Millennials/Snowflakes and I wouldn’t want to tar all with the same brush. But…

Recently the Prime Minister generated a great cloud of apparent shock and horror by using the word ‘Surrender’ in relation to a parliamentary Bill. Apparently, ‘Surrender’ is a militaristic word, and therefore to be classed as inflammatory language. ‘Surrender’, it seems, has never been and cannot ever be used anywhere else than in the field of battle. So if I am driving erratically and a policeman should tap on my car window and say, Excuse me, Madam, I will require you to surrender your driving licence at the nearest Police Station … ??

‘Humbug’ is an ornate, old-fashioned, but no more offensive version of ‘rubbish!’ Dickens was fond of it and had Scrooge exclaim Bah, Humbug! in A Christmas Carol. A humbug is nothing more than a sugary sweet (see above). I don’t like them myself, probably because of their horrid stripes and tooth-cracking hardness, but I would defend anybody’s right to refer to them as humbugs as opposed to laterally-banded confectionary items.

So, in relation to the apparent shocking and terrifying of his fellow MPs by the use of the word ‘Surrender’ in relation to the enactment of a Bill which would in effect bring about political surrender, he replied

“Mr Speaker, I have never heard such humbug in all my life.”

Gasp! Another shocking word.

I suspect this parliamentary outrage is of the deliberately manufactured political kind rather than true Snowflakery, which makes it hypocritical and therefore twice, nay thrice as annoying. English is a vigorous, robust, joyous language; its rich, eccentric vocabulary has been drawn from wave after wave of invaders and conquerors. We had the Saxons, we had the Vikings, we had the Romans, we had William the Conqueror, let’s face it we almost had the Germans as well… And politicians in the past, whether within Parliament or outside of it, have never shied away from using this linguistic resource to its fullest.

A couple of examples:

From Enoch Powell’s ‘rivers of blood’ speech. I for one am not afraid to find it on the internet and read it – yea, and carefully, from start to finish – for fear of some mental contamination, an instant attack of rabid racism:

“As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood’ .”

And then from possibly the most famous Prime Ministerial speech of all time:

‘We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. We shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender…’

‘Humbug’ begins to look a bit tame after that, doesn’t it?

What hope for us if we have even, now, become afraid to express our own thoughts in our own language?

5 thoughts on “Oh, for Pete’s Sake!

  1. I heard the ‘humbug’ exchange…glued to the parliament live channel….. and would have been tempted to use the word myself. The M.P. wailing on about the death of Jo Cox must have modelled herself on the heroines of soap operas…where has all this unseemly emotion come from in our society?
    Did you hear the Attorney General being accused of favouring domestic violence because he used that old chestnut of the Bar ”When did you stop beating your wife?’ to illustrate a logical fallacy. There seems to be a cultural rift taking place where staples of language are no longer understood.
    All I can say is ‘No surrender’.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I wonder if this ‘taking things literally’ phenomenon – if genuine – could be something to do with the internet and its effect on the brain. I’ve noticed some people in public life don’t seem to recognise metaphor or figures of speech. As you say, a cultural rift. Unfortunately I couldn’t watch the actual exchange as no longer have a TV. Get news updates and analysis from Radio 4, the World Service and the BBC News app.

      Like

  2. Thank you for this post. It’s the first of your work I’ve read and I enjoyed it.

    I do, however, think you’re selling the humble humbug short with your “tooth-cracking hardness” critique. Having gained a lifetime of experience with this alleged problem, I highly recommend “Hard Boiled”, 7th October 2019, at https://thethinkingwasp.wordpress.com/ for advice on the penultimate line. It will solve your issue.

    As a bonus for the wordsmith in you, perhaps you might like “Anglo Saxon Words”, 15th September 2019 at the same location.

    Regardless, I have taken the momentous step of hitting ‘follow’ and do declare myself your #1 fan.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s